4.5 Article

Cadaveric Study of Sacroiliac Joint Innervation: Implications for Diagnostic Blocks and Radiofrequency Ablation

Journal

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 456-464

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000156

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives: Optimization of clinical outcomes of lateral branch radiofrequency ablation or blocks for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain requires precise nerve localization; however, there is a lack of comprehensive morphological studies. The objectives of this cadaveric study were to document SIJ innervation relative to bony landmarks in 3 dimensions and to identify reference points visible under ultrasound and fluoroscopy for optimal needle placement. Methods: In 25 cadaveric hemipelves, L5-S4 lateral branches were exposed, digitized, and modeled in 3 dimensions. The models were used to compare innervation patterns between specimens and to quantify the distances of the nerves innervating the SIJ relative to the transverse sacral tubercles (TSTs) and posterior sacral foramina. Quadrants of origin of the nerves were recorded. Results: The SIJ was innervated by the posterior sacral network: S1-S2 contributed in all specimens, S3 in 88%, L5 in 8%, and S4 in 4%. Most frequently, the lateral branch(es) emerged from the inferolateral S1, superolateral and inferolateral S2, and superolateral S3 quadrants. All TSTs were easily identifiable elevations that were used to landmark the nerves innervating the SIJ. The majority of branches of the posterior sacral network crossed the lateral sacral crest between TST1-3, with the greatest concentration between TST2-3. Only 3 specimens had a branch superior or inferior to these landmarks. Conclusions: Based on the innervation pattern and using bony landmarks identifiable under ultrasound and fluoroscopy, 2 radiofrequency ablation techniqueswere proposed. Further research is required to determine the accuracy and reliability of needle placement and to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available