4.0 Article

Movements and landscape use of camels in central Australia revealed by GPS satellite

Journal

RANGELAND JOURNAL
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 33-41

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/RJ09050

Keywords

biotelemetry; Camelus dromedarius; habitat utilisation

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Federal Government
  2. Department for Environment and Heritage South Australia
  3. Department of Environment and Conservation Western Australia
  4. Desert Channels Queensland Inc.
  5. Department of Water Land and Biodiversity Conservation South Australia
  6. Alinytjara Wilurara NRM Board
  7. South Australian Arid Lands NRM Board
  8. Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analysed the movement of seven female camels collared in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands of South Australia. Understanding the movement patterns of feral camels and subsequently where high densities are likely to threaten biodiversity and cultural assets, provides land managers and government agencies with information and decision support tools to manage camel impacts. Accordingly, we tested if there were any seasonal changes in camel movement, any measurable separation between home range and migration, and any relationship between broader camel landscape use, rainfall and mountainous terrain. We fitted ARGOS GPS satellite collars to seven female camels in South Australia during August 2007 and found evidence to suggest that over a 12-month study period, some camels had returned to locations that they had previously visited. This cyclic movement pattern was more regular up to similar to 50 days, however, one collared individual returned to a previous location after 300 days. Despite only having a small sample size, we did find camels moving into areas that received higher rainfalls in the warmer months and possibly some attraction of these camels to steep mountainous terrain over this period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available