4.7 Article

Monte Carlo-based analytical model for small and variable fields delivered by TomoTherapy

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 229-234

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.018

Keywords

Monte Carlo simulation; TomoTherapy; Small fields

Funding

  1. University of Wisconsin
  2. Department of Medical Physics
  3. TomoTherapy Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: Extend to very small fields the validity of a Monte Carlo (MC) based model of TomoTherapy called TomoPen for future implementation of the dynamic jaws feature for helical TomoTherapy. Materials and methods: First, the modelling of the electron source was revisited using a new method to measure source obscuration for very small fields (<1 cm). The method consisted in MC simulations simulations and measurements of the central dose in a water phantom for a 10 cm x FW field scanned to deliver a 10 x 10 cm(2) fluence. FW, the longitudinal field width, was varied from 0.4 to 5 cm. The second part of the work consisted of adapting TomoPen to account for any configuration of the jaws in a fast and efficient way by using routinely only the phase-space file of the largest field (5 cm) and interpolated analytical information of phase-space files of smaller field widths. Results: For the electron source fine tuning, it was shown that the best results were obtained for a 1.1 mm wide spot. Our single phase-space method showed no significant differences compared to MC simulations of various field widths even though only longitudinal intensity and angular analytical functions were applied to the 5 cm phase-space. Conclusion: The designed model is able to simulate all jaw openings from the 5 cm field phase-space file by applying a bi-dimensional analytical function accounting for the fluence and the angular distribution in the longitudinal direction. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 94 (2010) 229-234

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available