Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography

Meta-analysis: Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Assessing Steno-occlusions in Peripheral Arterial Disease

(2013) Jan Menke   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Single-dose time-resolved contrast enhanced hybrid MR angiography in diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease: Compared with digital subtraction angiography

(2010) Chun-Chieh Wang et al.   JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Evaluation of a High Spatial and Temporal Resolution 3-T MR Protocol with a Low Total Dose of Gadolinium versus Conventional Angiography

(2010) Ulrike I. Attenberger et al.   RADIOLOGY

Risk factors for NSF: A literature review

(2009) Martin R. Prince et al.   JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

MR Angiography of Infrapopliteal Arteries in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease by Using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: Diagnostic Accuracy Compared with Selective DSA

(2009) Harald Marcel Bonel et al.   RADIOLOGY

MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities

(2008) Hale Ersoy et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY

Peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T, improved spatial resolution and low dose contrast: initial clinical experience

(2008) Kambiz Nael et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Feasibility of Peripheral Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 3.0 Tesla With a Hybrid Technique

(2008) Frank Berg et al.   INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY

High-Spatial-Resolution Lower Extremity MR Angiography at 3.0 T: Contrast Agent Dose Comparison Study

(2008) Reza Habibi et al.   RADIOLOGY