4.6 Article

Stereotactic gamma-ray body radiation therapy for asynchronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma

Journal

RADIOLOGIA MEDICA
Volume 119, Issue 11, Pages 878-883

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-014-0402-3

Keywords

Renal cell carcinoma; Radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy; Gamma-ray; Asynchronous bilateral tumour

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To preliminarily evaluate the feasibility, therapeutic effect and toxicity of stereotactic gamma-ray body radiation therapy (gamma-SBRT) for asynchronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma (bRCC). A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of nine patients with asynchronous bRCC who were unable to undergo surgery and received gamma-SBRT between February 2002 and May 2012. A total dose of 36-51 Gy was delivered to the 50 % isodose line covering the planning target volume at 3-5 Gy/fraction, whereas a total dose of 60-85 Gy was delivered at 5-7 Gy/fraction to the gross target volume. The local control rate (LC) and overall survival rate (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient follow-up ended in March 2013 and the follow-up rate was 100 %. Of the nine patients, none presented with complete remission and five (55.6 %) achieved partial remission. The objective response rate was 55.6 %. The 1-, 3- and 5-year LC rates were 64.8, 43.2 and 43.2 %, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 66.7, 53.3 and 35.6 %, respectively. Four (44.4 %) patients had an acute radiation reaction; there were two cases of grade I leukocytopenia and two cases of grade I gastrointestinal reactions. Late radiation-induced toxicity consisted of grade II gastrointestinal reactions in two patients. Stereotactic gamma-ray body radiation therapy was found to be safe and effective in the treatment of asynchronous bRCC. Improved prognosis will require individualised treatment and a combination of multiple therapeutic approaches; this will be a primary research trend in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available