4.2 Article

Paleoceanographic changes and calcium carbonate dissolution in the central Fram Strait during the last 20 ka

Journal

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages 405-416

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2012.07.006

Keywords

Planktic foraminifera; Calcium carbonate preservation; Last deglaciation; Holocene; Fram Strait

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway within the framework of the project Arctic Natural Climate and Environmental Changes and Human Adaptation: From Science to Public Awareness (SciencePub)
  2. University of Tromso, Norway
  3. Statoil, Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A deep-sea sediment core covering the last 20 ka and located between the Polar and the Arctic fronts in the marginal ice zone (MIZ) of the central Fram Strait has been investigated for changes in paleoceanography and calcium carbonate preservation. The reconstruction is based on the distribution patterns of planktic foraminifera, mean shell weight and the degree of fragmentation of their shells, stable isotopes and other geochemical and sedimentological data. The results show that the planktic foraminifera shells are poorly preserved throughout most of the record. Only the intervals comprising the early Holocene from 10.8 to similar to 8 cal ka BP and the last 800 yr show improved preservation of CaCO3. The dissolution correlated with the extent of Arctic water and the associated marginal ice zone (MIZ) and high organic productivity. Dissolution of planktic foraminifera is generally high during the late deglaciation, mid and late Holocene prior to similar to 800 cal yr BP. The abundance of small subpolar species increases in the surface sediments dating from the last century, which could be interpreted as a large and significant surface water warming. However, this apparent high-magnitude warming seems to be overestimated due to preservation changes in the youngest sediments. (c) 2012 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available