4.2 Article

Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces

Journal

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages 542-569

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.821145

Keywords

Reference frame; Environmental space; Spatial memory; Reference direction; View-dependent; Orientation-free; Self-localization; Pointing; Survey knowledge; Virtual environment; Head-mounted display; Navigation; Spatial orientation

Funding

  1. EU grant Wayfinding (6th FP-NEST)
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. WCU (World Class University) programme
  4. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology through the National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-10008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two experiments examined how locations in environmental spaces, which cannot be overseen from one location, are represented in memory: by global reference frames, multiple local reference frames, or orientation-free representations. After learning an immersive virtual environment by repeatedly walking a closed multisegment route, participants pointed to seven previously learned targets from different locations. Contrary to many conceptions of survey knowledge, local reference frames played an important role: Participants performed better when their body or pointing targets were aligned with the local reference frame (corridor). Moreover, most participants turned their head to align it with local reference frames. However, indications for global reference frames were also found: Participants performed better when their body or current corridor was parallel/orthogonal to a global reference frame instead of oblique. Participants showing this pattern performed comparatively better. We conclude that survey tasks can be solved based on interconnected local reference frames. Participants who pointed more accurately or quickly additionally used global reference frames.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available