Assessment of proximal outcomes of self-management programs: translation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™)
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Assessment of proximal outcomes of self-management programs: translation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™)
Authors
Keywords
Self-management, Assessment, Chronic disease, Translation, Validation
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 1391-1403
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2012-09-17
DOI
10.1007/s11136-012-0268-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Evaluation of Chronic Disease Self-Management Support Across Settings: The International Experience of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire Quality Monitoring System
- (2011) Richard H. Osborne et al. NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
- DGRW-Update: Patientenschulung
- (2011) H. Faller et al. REHABILITATION
- Intermediate and Long-term Effects of a Standardized Back School for Inpatient Orthopedic Rehabilitation on Illness Knowledge and Self-management Behaviors
- (2010) Karin Meng et al. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
- The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review
- (2010) Kurt Kroenke et al. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
- Evaluation of patient self-management outcomes in health care: a systematic review
- (2010) S. Du et al. INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW
- Effectiveness of self-management interventions on mortality, hospital readmissions, chronic heart failure hospitalization rate and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review
- (2010) Joanne B. Ditewig et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Self-management for men surviving prostate cancer: a review of behavioural and psychosocial interventions to understand what strategies can work, for whom and in what circumstances
- (2010) Jane Cockle-Hearne et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Self-management and peer support among people with arthritis on a hospital joint replacement waiting list: a randomised controlled trial
- (2009) M. Crotty et al. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
- Effectiveness of a community-based osteoporosis education and self-management course: a wait list controlled trial
- (2009) K. L. Francis et al. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
- Testing Structural Equation Models or Detection of Misspecifications?
- (2009) Willem E. Saris et al. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL
- Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real World
- (2008) John W. Graham Annual Review of Psychology
- Meta-analysis of Quality of Life Outcomes Following Diabetes Self-management Training
- (2008) Jane Cochran et al. DIABETES EDUCATOR
- Depression and Disease Severity as Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure—A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
- (2008) Hermann Faller et al. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
- Summed score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was a reliable and valid method for depression screening in chronically ill elderly patients
- (2008) Femke Lamers et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Pain and Osteoarthritis in Primary Care: Factors Associated with Pain Perception in a Sample of 1,021 Patients
- (2008) Thomas Rosemann et al. PAIN MEDICINE
- Developing a self-rating measure of patient competence in the context of oncology: a multi-center study
- (2008) Jürgen M. Giesler et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Association of Depression and Anxiety Alone and in Combination With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Primary Care Patients
- (2008) Matthew J. Bair et al. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
- Literature Review of Methods to Translate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires for Use in Multinational Clinical Trials
- (2008) Catherine Acquadro et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started