Measurement invariance of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Colorectal quality-of-life instrument among modes of administration
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Measurement invariance of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Colorectal quality-of-life instrument among modes of administration
Authors
Keywords
Quality of life, FACT-C, Measurement invariance, Confirmatory factor analysis, Colorectal cancer, Mode of administration
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 1415-1426
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2012-09-28
DOI
10.1007/s11136-012-0272-x
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Mapping the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General or -Colorectal to SF-6D in Chinese Patients with Colorectal Neoplasm
- (2012) Carlos K.H. Wong et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Direct medical costs of care for Chinese patients with colorectal neoplasia: a health care service provider perspective
- (2011) Carlos K. H. Wong et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Validity and reliability study on traditional Chinese FACT-C in Chinese patients with colorectal neoplasm
- (2011) Carlos K. H. Wong et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Measuring Disparities
- (2011) Joseph J. Sudano et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Gender Differences in Multiple Underlying Dimensions of Health-related Quality of Life Are Associated with Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Status
- (2011) Dasha Cherepanov et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Psychometric analysis of the Chinese version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory with cancer patients in Hong Kong and Taiwan
- (2011) Samuel M. Y. Ho et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway
- (2011) Jocelyne Clench-Aas et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Chinese version of the self-report pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0: short form is acceptable
- (2011) Chung-Ying Lin et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Assessing measurement invariance of a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in radiotherapy patients
- (2011) Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Measurement invariance of the kidney disease and quality of life instrument (KDQOL-SF) across Veterans and non-Veterans
- (2010) Karen L Saban et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Cross-national comparability of the WHOQOL-BREF: A measurement invariance approach
- (2010) Peter Theuns et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Validation of the FACT-G scale for evaluating quality of life in cancer patients in Colombia
- (2010) Ricardo Sánchez et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Comparability of Interview- and Self-Administration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) in English- and Spanish-Speaking Ambulatory Cancer Patients
- (2009) Elizabeth A. Hahn et al. MEDICAL CARE
- The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: an examination of the factor structure and invariance among breast cancer survivors
- (2009) Jennifer Brunet et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Measurement invariance of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire across African–American and Latino adult asthma patients
- (2009) Pablo A. Mora et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Measurement equivalence of osteoporosis-specific and general quality-of-life instruments in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women
- (2009) Lisa M. Lix et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Telephone vs. mail survey gives different SF-36 quality-of-life scores among cancer survivors
- (2008) Trent D. Buskirk et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Validation of the French version of the colorectal-specific quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C
- (2008) Christine Rotonda et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started