4.5 Article

Assessment of the psychological burden associated with pruritus in hemodialysis patients using the kidney disease quality of life short form

Journal

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 603-612

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9964-x

Keywords

Hemodialysis; Quality of life; Depression; Sleep; Dry skin; Xerosis; Pruritus; Itch

Funding

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [484743/2006-6, 308068/2006-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To assess whether depression symptoms, poor sleep and dry skin bother explain association between pruritus and the burden of kidney disease in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods Cross-sectional study of 980 patients from a prospective study in dialysis units of Salvador, Brazil (PROHEMO). The Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form was used to determine scores of kidney disease burden (KDB) and sleep with higher scores indicating lower perceived burden and better sleep quality, respectively. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale was used for depression symptoms. Results Prevalence of severe pruritus (very much or extreme) was 19.4%. Significantly (P < 0.001) lower mean KDB score by 11.44 points was observed for patients with severe pruritus (34.18 +/- 27.51) than for those with no pruritus (45.62 +/- 30.73). Severe pruritus was associated with poorer sleep quality, higher odds of dry skin bother and higher depression symptoms score. Association of pruritus with KDB score was virtually eliminated after adjustment for sleep, dry skin bother and depression symptoms. Conclusions This study shows strong associations of severe pruritus with higher depression symptoms, poorer sleep and dry skin bother among MHD patients. The results support special attention to MHD patients with pruritus who often face high psychological burden.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available