4.3 Article

Differences in breast-feeding initiation and continuation by maternal diabetes status

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 727-735

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014000792

Keywords

Breast-feeding; Diabetes; Pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine (i) the prevalence of and associations between breast-feeding initiation and continuation by maternal diabetes status and (ii) the reasons for not initiating and/or continuing breast-feeding by maternal diabetes status. Design: Secondary data analyses of a population-based cross-sectional study were conducting using data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2009-2011. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the associations between breast-feeding initiation and continuation by diabetes status. Setting: Thirty states and New York City, USA. Subjects: Mothers of recently live-born infants, selected by birth certificate sampling. Results: Among 72 755 women, 8.8 % had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and 1.7 % had pregestational diabetes mellitus (PDM). Breast-feeding initiation was similar among GDM and no diabetes mellitus (NDM) women (80.8% v. 82.2 %, respectively, P = 0.2), but continuation was lower among GDM (65.7% v. 68.8 %, respectively, P = 0.01). PDM women had lower initiation and continuation compared with NDM (78.2%, P = 0.03 and 60.4%, P < 0.01, respectively). In adjusted analyses, current smoking status was a significant effect modifier for initiation, but not for continuation. Conclusions: Differences in breast-feeding initiation and continuation prevalence by maternal diabetes status may reflect differences in prenatal education, indicating the need for increased efforts among PDM women. Additionally, nonsmoking women with PDM or GDM would benefit from additional breast-feeding education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available