4.3 Article

The role of health-related, motivational and sociodemographic aspects in predicting food label use: a comprehensive study

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 407-414

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S136898001100156X

Keywords

Food label; Nutrition table; Comprehensive model; Predictors of food label use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Previous studies focused on a limited number of determinants of food label use. We therefore tested a comprehensive model of food label use consisting of sociodemographic, health-related and motivating variables. These three predictor groups were chosen based on the previous literature and completed with new predictors not yet examined in a comprehensive study of frequency of label use. Design: We sent questionnaires to a random sample of households in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Setting: The respondents filled in the questionnaire at home and returned it by mail. Subjects: We analysed the data of 1162 filled-in questionnaires (response rate = 38 %). Of the respondents, 637 were women (55%), and their mean age was 53.54 (SD 15.68) years. Results: Health-related variables were the most important group of predictors of label use, followed by motivating factors and sociodemographic variables. Placing importance on health, healthy eating and nutritional value of food, perceived vulnerability for diet-related diseases, nutrition knowledge, numeracy and gender were positively associated with frequency of food label use whereas shopping habits and seeing eating as something positive were negative predictors of frequency of label use. Conclusions: People's health consciousness should be raised in order to increase the frequency of food label use. Furthermore, it should be stressed that reading labels and keeping a healthy diet do not contradict 'good eating', and that both of these aspects can be combined with the help of food labels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available