4.3 Article

Television viewing and variations in energy intake in adults and children in the USA

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 609-617

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002916

Keywords

Television; Dietary patterns; Obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Examine the association between energy intake and television (TV) viewing in Americans. Design: Nationally representative, cross-sectional study of 20032006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Setting: Total energy intake was determined by two 24 h recalls. TV viewing was reported as low (<= 1 h/d), middle (23 h/d), and high (>= 4 h/d). Multivariate linear regression models were used to analyse TV viewing and energy intake, adjusted for BMI (percentile for children 218 years), age, ethnicity and physical activity. Subjects: Preschool children (25 years; n 1369), school-age children (611 years; n 1759), adolescents (1218 years; n 3233) and adults (>= 19 years; n 7850) in the USA. Results: There was a significant association between TV viewing and energy intake for adolescent girls (high v. low: beta=195.2, P=0.03) and men (high v. low: beta=2113.0, P=0.02; middle v. low: beta=2131.1, P=0.0002). Mean adjusted energy intake for adolescent girls was 7801.0, 8088.5 and 8618.2 kJ/d for low, middle and high TV viewing, respectively. Mean adjusted energy intake for men was 9845.9, 9297.2 and 9372.8 kJ/d for low, middle and high TV viewing. Conclusions: TV viewing was associated with energy intake in US children and adults only in 12-18-year-old girls and men. For girls, the high TV viewing category consumed more energy daily (816.3 kJ (195 kcal)) than the low category. In men, the middle and high TV viewing categories consumed less energy daily (548.4kJ (131 kcal) and 473.0 kJ (113 kcal), respectively) than the low category. Our findings support some, but not all previous research. Future research is needed to explore this complicated relationship with rigorous measures of energy intake and TV viewing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available