4.3 Article

Nutrient and food intakes differ among Latina subgroups during pregnancy

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 341-351

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S136898001100108X

Keywords

Dietary intake; Latinas; Nutrient intake; Food group serving intakes

Funding

  1. National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH EXTORT
  2. University of Connecticut Research Foundation
  3. University of Connecticut USDA
  4. USDA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To document nutrient and food group serving intakes from food sources among Latina subgroups living in the same geographical area. Design: A cross-sectional study. Nutrient and food group serving intakes were assessed by means of a 24 h recall administered immediately after a prenatal survey. Setting: Hartford, CT, USA. Subjects: A total of 233 low-income pregnant Latinas. For analyses, Latinas were classified into two groups on the basis of self-reported ethnic identity: Puerto Ricans and non-Puerto Rican Latinas. Results: Puerto Rican Latinas were more likely than non-Puerto Rican Latinas to be more acculturated and to consume foods (i.e. processed meat, cheese, soft drinks) and higher levels of nutrients (i.e. fat, SFA, MUFA, trans fatty acids) that have been implicated in the development of chronic diseases. By contrast, non-Puerto Rican Latinas were more likely to consume foods (i.e. fruits, dark green/yellow vegetables, tomatoes, non-starchy vegetables) and higher levels of nutrients (i.e. fibre, vegetable protein, folate, beta-carotene) that promote health when compared with Puerto Rican Latinas. Conclusions: Findings suggest that acculturation may play a role in dietary intake. Clinicians and dietitians need to be aware of these differences to encourage healthy eating patterns among more acculturated pregnant Latina clients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available