4.3 Article

Maternal depression and socio-economic status moderate the parenting style/child obesity association

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1237-1244

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009992163

Keywords

Child obesity; Parenting styles; Parental depression; Socio-economic status

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture [2004-05545]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of the study was to test the moderating influence of two risk factors, maternal depression and socio-economic status (SES), on the association between authoritarian and permissive parenting styles and child obesity. Design: Correlational, cross-sectional study. Parenting style was measured with the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ). Maternal depression was measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD). BMI-for-age percentile was used to categorize children by weight status (children with BMI-for-age >= 95th percentile were classified as obese). SES was computed from parent education and occupational status using the four-factor Hollingshead index. Setting: Rural public schools in a mid-western state in the USA. Subjects: One hundred and seventy-six mothers of first-grade children (ninety-one boys, eighty-five girls) enrolled in rural public schools. Results: Both maternal depression and SES were found to moderate the permissive parenting style/child obesity association, but not the authoritarian/child obesity association. For depressed mothers, but not for non-depressed mothers, more permissive parenting was predictive of child obesity. Similarly more permissive parenting was predictive of child obesity among higher SES mothers, but not for lower SES mothers. Conclusions: Maternal depression and SES interact with permissive parenting style to predict child obesity. Future research should examine the relationship among these variables using a longitudinal design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available