4.3 Article

Sugar and fat intake among children in Scotland: what is needed to reach the dietary targets?

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1286-1294

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009992175

Keywords

Sugar; Fat; Intake; Children; Scotland

Funding

  1. Food Standards Agency Scotland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the intake and sources of non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES) and fat among children in Scotland in relation to socio-economic status, and to estimate the changes in diet required to achieve recommended levels of intake. Design: Cross-sectional survey with diet assessed by semi-quantitative FFQ. Setting: Eighty postcode sectors across Scotland. Subjects: Children (n 1398) aged 3-17 years recruited from the Child Benefit register (76% of those contacted). Results: The mean intake of NMES of 17.4 (95% CI 17.0, 17.8) % food energy was considerably higher than the UK recommended population average of 11% food energy. The mean intake of total fat of 32.9 (95% CI 32.7, 33.2) % food energy met the recommended population average of no more than 35% food energy, while the mean intake of SFA of 13.8 (95% CI 13.7, 14.0) % food energy was above the recommended population average of no more than 11% food energy. Despite clear socio-economic gradients in the mean daily consumption of many 'healthy' and `unhealthy' food groups, socio-economic differences in NMES as a percentage of food energy were limited and there was no significant variation in the intake of total fat or SEA as a percentage of food energy with socio-economic status. Modelling of the data showed that removing sugar-sweetened soft drinks and increasing fruit and vegetable intake by 50% would not restore the intake of NMES and SFA to recommended levels. Conclusions: Major changes in the intake of many food groups will be required to bring the NMES and saturated fat intake in line with current dietary recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available