4.3 Article

A Comparison of Diabetes Learning With and Without Interactive Multimedia to Improve Knowledge, Control, and Self-Care Among People With Diabetes in Taiwan

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 317-328

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00786.x

Keywords

complementary and alternative medicine; diabetes; interactive multimedia; self-care; traditional Chinese medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Given the increased popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), this study aimed to evaluate the effects of interactive media on self-directed learning in patients' knowledge of diabetes and related CAM/TCM strategies, the ability to control blood sugar levels, and self-care in people with diabetes. Design An experimental study design was used. The experimental group received patient education through interactive multimedia about diabetes for 3 months, while the control group received a routine 3-month patient education. Sample On completion, 60 subjects from Taiwan were evaluated-30 in an experimental group and 30 in a control group. Measurements Data were collected from both groups at baseline and at the completion of the patient education. The findings were then compared to evaluate the effects of the intervention on the subjects' knowledge of diabetes, blood sugar control, and self-care. Results The experimental group showed greater improvement in understanding diabetes than the control (t=3.29, p <.001). There was no significant difference in control of blood sugar levels (t=-1.72, p=.10) and self-care (F=1.03, p=.32). Conclusions The use of an interactive multimedia device to intervene in diabetes self-care was effective only in raising the subjects' knowledge about the disease. Additionally, the subjects may need more time to implement more effective blood sugar control and self-care activities after receiving instruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available