4.6 Article

Identifying environmental health priorities in underserved populations: a study of rural versus urban communities

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 127, Issue 11, Pages 994-1004

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.005

Keywords

Community-engaged approach; Rural versus urban communities; Minority populations; Community-based interventions; Risk perception

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R21 ES020205]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U48/DP001915]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Understanding and effectively addressing persistent health disparities in minority communities requires a clear picture of members' concerns and priorities. This study was intended to engage residents in urban and rural communities in order to identify environmental health priorities. Specific emphasis was placed on how the communities: defined the term environment; their perceptions of environmental exposures as affecting their health; specific priorities in their communities; and differences in urban versus rural populations. Study design: A community-engaged approach was used to develop and implement focus groups and compare environmental health priorities in urban versus rural communities. Methods: A total of eight focus groups were conducted: four in rural and four in urban communities. Topics included: defining the term environment; how the environment may affect health; and environmental priorities within their communities, using both open discussion and a predefined list. Data were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively to identify patterns and trends. Results: There were important areas of overlap in priorities between urban and rural communities; both emphasized the importance of the social environment and shared a concern over air pollution from industrial sources. In contrast, for urban focus groups, abandoned houses and their social and physical sequelae were a high priority while concerns about adequate sewer and water services and road maintenance were high priorities in rural communities. Conclusions: This study was able to identify environmental health priorities in urban versus rural minority communities. In contrast to some previous risk perception research, the results of this study suggest prioritization of tangible, known risks in everyday life instead of rare, disaster-related events, even in communities that have recently experienced devastating damage from tornadoes. The findings can help inform future efforts to study, understand and effectively address environmental issues, and are particularly relevant to developing effective community-based strategies in vulnerable populations. (C) 2013 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available