4.3 Article

Repolarization Changes Induced by Mental Stress in Normal Subjects and Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Effect of Nitroglycerine

Journal

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 23-29

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818a1d56

Keywords

electrocardiogram; ventricular repolarization; mental stress; nitroglycerine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Mental stress can significantly affect ventricular repolarization, which could potentially trigger arrhythmias. We compared the effect of mental stress on repolarization indexed by the amplitude and area of the T wave in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and healthy subjects. Methods: Fourteen healthy controls (11 M, mean age 42 years) and 14 patients with stable CAD (12 M, mean age 64) underwent a mental stress protocol consisting of mental arithmetic followed by a speech (5 minutes each), which was performed on two occasions following either nitroglycerine (NTG) or placebo. Multiple 12-lead electrocardiograms were acquired and repolarization was analyzed using automatically measured T wave amplitude (T-amp) and area Results: When preceded by placebo the overall effect of mental stress, whether induced by arithmetic or speech, was significantly different in CAD patients compared with controls, with a decrease in T-amp and T-area in controls and an increase in patients; e.g., change in T-amp during arithmetic -20 +/- 3 mu V in controls versus 4 +/- 2 mu V in patients, p < .001, and during speech -9 +/- 3 mu V in controls versus 7 +/- 1 mu V in patients, p < .001. Following NTG, the effect of stress on repolarization was similar in the 2 groups, with a reversed effect, i.e., decrease instead of increase in T-amp and T-area in CAD patients. Conclusions: The effect of mental stress on ventricular repolarization is significantly different in CAD patients compared with healthy controls. These differences are considerably reduced by NTG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available