4.5 Article

Early follicular testosterone level predicts preference for masculinity in male faces - But not for women taking hormonal contraception

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 142-150

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.012

Keywords

Face; Testosterone; Hormone; Masculinity; Preference; Menstrual cycle; Hormonal contraception; Gonadal steroids

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P1_139072]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P1_139072] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been shown that women's preference for masculinity in male faces changes across the menstrual cycle. Preference for masculinity is stronger when conception probability is high than when it is low. These findings have been linked to cyclic fluctuations of hormone levels. The purpose of the present study is to further investigate the link between gonadal steroids (i.e. testosterone, estradiol, and progesterone) and masculinity preference in women, while holding the cycle phase constant. Sixty-two female participants were tested in their early follicular cycle phase, when conception probability is low. Participants were shown face pairs and where asked to choose the more attractive face. Face pairs consisted of a masculinized and feminized version of the same face. For naturally cycling women we found a positive relationship between saliva testosterone levels and masculinity preference, but there was no link between any hormones and masculinity preference for women taking hormonal contraception. We conclude that in naturally cycling women early follicular testosterone levels are associated with masculinity preference. However, these hormonal links were not found for women with artificially modified hormonal levels, that is, for women taking hormonal contraception. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available