4.5 Review

Structure provided by parents in middle childhood predicts cortisol reactivity in adolescence among the offspring of parents with bipolar disorder and controls

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 773-785

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.12.011

Keywords

Cortisol; Adolescence; Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; Parenting; Affective disorders

Funding

  1. Fonds de ta Recherche en Sante du Quebec
  2. Conseil Quebecois de la Recherche Sociate
  3. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec [1994-1998]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies suggest that childhood exposure to adversity influences later functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Parenting style in childhood, a putative moderator of adversity, may be important in determining HPA reactivity in adolescence. As part of a prospective, longitudinal study, saliva was collected at awakening and 30 and 60 min later over 2 days among 27 offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (high risk; 16.7 +/- 1.5 years) and 26 offspring of parents with no mental disorders (low risk; 16.2 +/- 1.7 years). In addition, 24 of the high risk and 22 of the low risk adolescents completed the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Parents had rated their parenting style when their offspring were 6-13 years of age. Low levels of structure (i.e. organization and consistency) provided by parents in middle childhood were predictive of an elevated cortisol response following awakening (beta = -0.36; p < 0.05) and during the TSST (beta = -0.33; p < 0.05), even while controlling for risk group. These associations were independent of other indices of environmental risk, and of adolescents' mood and behavior. The level of structure provided by parents in childhood predicted independent measures of cortisol reactivity in adolescence, suggesting that parenting style may regulate different aspects of HPA reactivity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available