4.6 Article

Attentional bias and metacognitions in cancer survivors with high fear of cancer recurrence

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 416-423

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3659

Keywords

cancer; fear of recurrence; attentional bias

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundFear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common and severe problem amongst cancer survivors, but mechanisms to explain its development and maintenance are still lacking. The self-regulatory executive function (S-REF) model suggests that metacognitions and attentional bias to cancer-related words may explain high FCR. Thus, this study aimed to explore relationships between FCR, metacognitions and attentional bias in a mixed group of cancer survivors. MethodSixty-three early-stage breast or prostate cancer survivors, diagnosed within 6months to 5years prior to participation and who had completed all hospital-based treatment with no evidence of cancer recurrence were recruited through two metropolitan oncology clinics. Participants completed a questionnaire battery and the dot-probe task. ResultsSurvivors with clinical FCR had significantly greater positive beliefs about worry (10.1 vs 7.4, p=0.002) and beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of worry (12.0 vs 7.7, p=0.000) than those with non-clinical FCR, whereas the total metacognition score significantly predicted FCR in multiple regression analysis (=0.371, p=0.001). No significant differences were detected between participants scoring above and below clinical FCR levels in attention bias indices. ConclusionsThis study found partial support for the S-REF model of FCR, with metacognitions but not attentional bias found to be related to FCR. Further research is needed to explore attentional biases in more detail. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available