4.7 Review

Quality of life instruments used in mental health research: Properties and utilization

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 215, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.023

Keywords

Quality of life; Mental disorders; Cluster analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Fonda-Mental Foundation, a foundation of scientific cooperation
  2. French Ministry of Health
  3. General Directorate of Health (Direction Generale de la Sante)
  4. Directorate of Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics (Direction de la Recherche, des Etudes, de l'Evaluation et des Statistiques)
  5. general scheme (Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladies des Travailleurs Salaries)
  6. scheme for self-employed people (Regime Social des Independants)
  7. National Solidarity Fund for Autonomy (Caisse Nationale de Solidarite pour l'Autonomie)
  8. National Institute for Prevention and Health Education (Insitut National de Prevention et d'Education pour la Sante)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quality of life (QoL) assessment is increasingly used in mental health. Multiple instruments exist, but the conditions for choosing one instrument over another for purposes of a specific study are not clear. We performed a systematic review to identify the QoL instruments used in mental health. The instruments were systematically described regarding their intrinsic properties (e.g., generic v. disease-specific) and their characteristics of utilization in studies (e.g., study objectives). Using cluster analyses, we investigated the existence of similar instruments with respect to each of these sets of characteristics and studied potential links between instruments' intrinsic properties and their characteristics of utilization. We included 149 studies in which 56 distinct instruments were used. Similarities were found among instruments in terms of their intrinsic properties as well as their characteristics of utilization, leading to the construction of four clusters of instruments in each case. However, no relevant links were identified between instruments' intrinsic properties and their characteristics of utilization, suggesting that the choice of QoL instruments did not depend on their properties. A consensus about common QoL instruments must be reached to facilitate the choice of instruments, the comparison of results and thus to have an impact on clinical and policy decision-making. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available