4.7 Article

Premorbid tobacco smoking is associated with later age at onset in schizophrenia

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 178, Issue 3, Pages 461-466

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.08.014

Keywords

Nicotine; Cognition; Symptom; Duration

Categories

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30530300, 30125014]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB512301]
  3. NARSAD
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Medical Research Council [G9817803B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rates of cigarette smoking in individuals with schizophrenia well exceed those in the general population and in other mental illnesses. In the present study, we examined the relationship between smoking status, clinical characteristics and cognitive functions in 230 male Chinese schizophrenia patients. They were interviewed by experienced psychiatrists using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) (SCID-P). Clinical symptoms were rated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Revised Tolerance Questionnaire (RTQ) used to evaluate the severity of nicotine dependence. Nine neuropsychological tests were used to assess cognitive function. We found that never-smokers had a younger age at examination and earlier onset and longer duration of illness than smokers and ex-smokers. The age of initiation of regular smoking in patients was significantly earlier than their age of illness onset. We found that longer duration of illness was significantly associated with higher RTQ scores. Ex-smokers with schizophrenia performed significantly more poorly on the Stroop C test than smokers. The results imply that smoking may affect cognitive function and illness onset time in patients with schizophrenia. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available