4.0 Article

A survey of putative anxiety-associated genes in panic disorder patients with and without bladder symptoms

Journal

PSYCHIATRIC GENETICS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 271-278

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283586248

Keywords

ADORA2A; ANO2; genetics; interstitial cystitis; panic disorder; SLC6A4

Funding

  1. Interstitial Cystitis Association
  2. National Institutes of Mental Health [MH 28274, PO1MH60970, MH37592, MH65213, MH48858]
  3. UCSF bridge award
  4. K Award from the National Institute for Drug Abuse [1 K01 DA029598]
  5. NARSAD Young Investigator Award
  6. Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc.
  7. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  8. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  9. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD)
  10. Sackler Foundation
  11. Templeton Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background We have previously described a subtype of panic disorder (PD) that we termed 'bladder syndrome', characterized by urological and bladder symptoms (and possibly interstitial cystitis) in the patients and/or their family members and confirmed the validity of this subset in family linkage and association analysis. In this study, we determine (a) whether 20 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reported in the literature can be replicated in a new PD dataset and (b) whether dividing the sample into those with and without the 'bladder syndrome' can help to resolve the genetic heterogeneity within this new sample. Methods We selected 20 putative associated SNPs from the literature, taken from studies published since 2004. We tested these SNPs for association in a sample of 351 PD patients and 552 controls, and then divided them into subgroups of 92 patients from bladder families and 259 from nonbladder families. Results (a) When analyzed in all PD patients, none of the 20 SNPs appeared to be replicated (except for SLC6A4 from our previous study, but in a sample that overlaps substantially with that in our previous report). (b) However, some intriguing findings emerged when we separated bladder from nonbladder families: SLC6A4, reported by us previously, yielded stronger evidence than before (P = 0.0018) when examined only in nonbladder families, and in contrast, is not statistically significant in bladder families. Two other markers yielded nominally significant results in bladder families - rs5751876 in ADORA2A (P = 0.046) and rs12579350 in TMEM16B (P = 0.035) - but were not significant in nonbladder families. (c) Two markers had noticeably lower P-values when we differentiated the women and analyzed them separately - rs12579350 in TMEM16B (P-value decreased from 0.035, as above, to 0.00055) and a different SNP in ADORA2A, rs4822492 (P-value decreases from 0.07 to 0.028). Significance Our results indicate that most of the 20 reported associations do not hold up when PD is analyzed as one group. However, our findings provide further evidence that PD with bladder symptoms may be genetically different from PD without bladder. We suggest that it is worth pursuing SLC6A4 in nonbladder PD, and ADORA2A and TMEM16B in bladder PD. Also, the possibility of a male-female difference in PD is worth pursuing. We also briefly discuss issues of replication and multiple tests. Psychiatr Genet 22:271-278 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available