4.1 Article

Identification of ovarian cancer-associated proteins in symptomatic women: A novel method for semi-quantitative plasma proteomics

Journal

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue 3-4, Pages 170-181

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201100008

Keywords

Biomarkers; IgY depletion; Liquid phase IEF; Ovarian cancer; Plasma

Funding

  1. NHMRC
  2. Fight Cancer Foundation
  3. Lion Nathan
  4. BHP Billiton
  5. Harold and Corra Brennen Benevolent Trust
  6. Australian NHMRC [381413]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To evaluate the utility of an enhanced biomarker discovery approach in order to identify potential biomarkers relevant to ovarian cancer detection. Experimental design We combined immuno-depletion, liquid-phase IEF, 1D-DIGE, MALDI-TOF/MS and LC-MS/MS to identify differentially expressed proteins in the plasma of symptomatic ovarian cancer patients, stratified by stage, compared to samples obtained from normal subjects. Results We demonstrate that this approach is a practical alternative to traditional 2D gel techniques and that it has some advantages, most notably increased protein capacity. Proteins were identified in all 76 bands excised from the gels in this project and confirmed the cancer-associated expression of several well-established biomarkers of ovarian cancer. These included C-reactive protein (CRP), haptoglobin, alpha-2 macroglobulin and A1A2. We also identified new ovarian cancer candidate biomarkers, Protein S100-A9 (S100A9) and multimerin-2. The cancer-associated differential expression of CRP and S100A9 was further confirmed by Western blot and ELISA. Conclusions The methods developed in this study allow for the increased loading of plasma proteins into the analytical stream when compared to traditional 2D-DIGE. This increased protein identification sensitivity allowed us to identify new putative ovarian cancer biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available