4.5 Article

Serum protein S100A9, SOD3, and MMP9 as new diagnostic biomarkers for pulmonary tuberculosis by iTRAQ-coupled two-dimensional LC-MS/MS

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 58-67

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400366

Keywords

Cell biology; MMP9; Potential biomarkers; Pulmonary tuberculosis; S100A9; SOD3

Funding

  1. National Special Sci-Tech Projects [2012ZX10005001-006]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB543002]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273882]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to discover the novel noninvasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). We applied iTRAQ 2D LC-MS/MS technique to investigate protein profiles in patients with pulmonary TB and other lung diseases. A total of 34 differentially expressed proteins (24 upregulated proteins and ten downregulated proteins) were identified in the serum of pulmonary TB patients. Significant differences in protein S100-A9 (S100A9), extracellular superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] (SOD3), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) were found between pulmonary TB and other lung diseases by ELISA. Correlations analysis revealed that the serum concentration of MMP9 in the pulmonary TB was in moderate correlation with SOD3 (r = 0.581) and S100A9 (r = 0.471), while SOD3 was in weak correlation with S100A9 (r = 0.287). The combination of serum S100A9, SOD3, and MMP9 levels could achieve 92.5% sensitivity and 95% specificity to discriminate between pulmonary TB and healthy controls, 90% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity to discriminate between pulmonary TB and pneumonia, and 85% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity to discriminate between pulmonary TB and lung cancer, respectively. The results showed that S100A9, SOD3, and MMP9 may be potential diagnostic biomarkers for pulmonary TB, and provided experimental basis for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available