4.5 Review

Molecular interaction networks for the analysis of human disease: Utility, limitations, and considerations

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 13, Issue 23-24, Pages 3393-3405

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200570

Keywords

Integrative omics; Interactome; Network; Protein-protein interaction; Systems biology

Funding

  1. University of Sydney Postgraduate Award
  2. Sydney Medical School Research Top-up Scholarship
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  6. Cancer Institute New South Wales
  7. Education Investment Fund Super Science Scheme
  8. New South Wales State Government Science Leveraging Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-throughput -omics' data can be combined with large-scale molecular interaction networks, for example, protein-protein interaction networks, to provide a unique framework for the investigation of human molecular biology. Interest in these integrative -omics' methods is growing rapidly because of their potential to understand complexity and association with disease; such approaches have a focus on associations between phenotype and network-type. The potential of this research is enticing, yet there remain a series of important considerations. Here, we discuss interaction data selection, data quality, the relative merits of using data from large high-throughput studies versus a meta-database of smaller literature-curated studies, and possible issues of sociological or inspection bias in interaction data. Other work underway, especially international consortia to establish data formats, quality standards and address data redundancy, and the improvements these efforts are making to the field, is also evaluated. We present options for researchers intending to use large-scale molecular interaction networks as a functional context for protein or gene expression data, including microRNAs, especially in the context of human disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available