4.2 Article

PSCL: Predicting Protein Subcellular Localization Based on Optimal Functional Domains

Journal

PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 15-22

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/092986612798472820

Keywords

Incremental feature selection (IFS); jackknife test; minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR); nearest neighbor algorithm; optimal functional domains; protein subcellular localization

Funding

  1. Systems Biology Research Foundation of Shanghai University
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [09DZ227180]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070954]
  4. CAS [KSCX2-YW-R-112]
  5. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [09JC1406600]
  6. Shanghai Education Committee [J50103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that protein subcellular localizations are closely related to their functions. Although many computational methods and tools are available from Internet, it is still necessary to develop new algorithms in this filed to gain a better understanding of the complex mechanism of plant subcellular localization. Here, we provide a new web server named PSCL for plant protein subcellular localization prediction by employing optimized functional domains. After feature optimization, 848 optimal functional domains from InterPro were obtained to represent each protein. By calculating the distances to each of the seven categories, PSCL showing the possibilities of a protein located into each of those categories in ascending order. Toward our dataset, PSCL achieved a first-order predicted accuracy of 75.7% by jackknife test. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showing that catalytic activity, cellular process and metabolic process are strongly correlated with the localization of plant proteins. Finally, PSCL, a Linux Operate System based web interface for the predictor was designed and is accessible for public use at http://pscl.biosino.org/.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available