4.4 Article

a-Methylacyl-CoA racemase expression and lethal prostate cancer in the Physicians' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 301-306

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.21432

Keywords

AMACR; biomarker; cohort; urologic

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [CA-34944, CA-40360, CA-097193, CA141298]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD [HL-26490, HL-34595]
  3. NIH [NCI CA55075, 5R01 CA090598]
  4. US Army Prostate Cancer Program [W81XWH-05-1-0562]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND a-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is an enzyme that serves as a diagnostic biomarker of prostate cancer in clinical practice. Recent studies suggest that low AMACR expression is associated with biochemical recurrence and the development of fatal disease. METHODS. We conducted a prospective cohort study among 920 men aged 47-84 years, who were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Physicians' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohorts, and whose resected tissue specimens were available for immunohistochemical analysis. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the association of AMACR expression with lethal prostate cancer over a 20-year follow-up period. RESULTS. In total, 68 men died from prostate cancer, and an additional 18 developed bony metastases during follow-up. We found that lower AMACR intensity was associated with higher prostate-specific antigen levels (P = 0.003) and more advanced clinical stage (P = 0.06) at diagnosis, and a nonsignificant trend for higher risk of lethal outcomes. The hazard ratio (HR) comparing the lowest to the highest quartile of AMACR expression intensity was 1.53 ((95% CI: 0.86-2.73), P-for-trend across quartiles = 0.07); this trend was further attenuated after adjustment for age, Gleason score, stage, and cohort with a HR of 1.24 (95% CI: 0.69-2.22), P-for-trend = 0.23.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available