4.4 Article

Explosive Initiation of Various Forms of Ti/2B Reactive Materials

Journal

PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 454-462

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prep.201300114

Keywords

Ti/2B mechanical alloys; Ti/2B reactive materials; Reactive milling; Ti/2B detonation interaction; Simultaneous imaging spectroscopy; Energetics Explosives

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reactivity of titanium and boron mixtures under detonation initiation in air is examined experimentally in a constant volume blast chamber. Fine powder mixtures and mechanical alloys are pressed into compacts and are ignited using an HMX-based explosive initiated with both single point and triple point detonator configurations. Transient pressure measurements, optical imaging, pyrometry, and spectroscopy are performed to analyse the reaction. All mixtures show no significant enhancement in the primary blast wave strength, indicating a relatively slow reaction. However, measurable increases in overpressure are generated due to Ti and/or B reaction. It is found that Ti/2B mechanical alloys significantly outperform blended powder mixtures in generating larger overpressures, yielding energy releases of 45% and 20%, respectively. Triple point initiation of the mechanical alloys further enhances the overpressure generation when compared to single point initiation of the alloys, increasing the energy yield. The overpressure of blended powders is also exceeded by a TiB2 compound, suggesting that the intermetallic reaction may be less critical than previously thought. Detonation merging at the plane of interaction between explosive and Ti/2B material is shown to significantly enhance conversion. Spectroscopic measurements show the appearance of BO2 emission relatively late after detonation in the most reactive Ti/2B reactive mechanical alloys, and it appears strongest in system that show greatest reactivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available