4.4 Article

Increasing the Utility of the Copper Cylinder Expansion Test

Journal

PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 433-439

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prep.201000072

Keywords

Cylinder Test; CYLEX; Gurney; High Explosives; Hydrocode; Liners

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the development of a new methodology for analyzing CYLEX tests streak images. In these tests, the displacement of the wall of an explosive filled cylinder is obtained by backlighting the cylinder. The profile is imaged through a slit and streaked across a film record as the cylinder is detonated. A critical step in processing this data is the spatial calibration of the film and extraction of the profile of the cylinder from the image. Historically this has been a tedious task as it was performed by eye with the assistance of an optical comparator. Recently we developed an algorithm which automates the data calibration and extraction process of digitized streak records utilizing the Shen-Castan edge detection algorithm and the image processing capabilities found in the IGOR PRO software. The new processing methodology greatly increases the resolution of the data, removes human subjectivity, and reduces analysis time from hours to seconds. The higher resolution of the new method has enabled much greater accuracy in measuring early-time (<15 mu s) expansion. With the aid of CTH hydrocode calculations, new fitting functions were developed to model both the early and late-time expansion data. These functions contain physically meaningful fitting parameters and include terms which mimic the intensity and time scales of the shock and gas induced expansion of the cylinder independently. We demonstrate the methodology and hydrocode calculations on a recent CYLEX test series aimed at examining the effects of a plastic liner on high-purity oxygen-free copper cylinders filled with a high explosive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available