4.6 Article

Butanol recovery from aqueous solution into ionic liquids by liquid-liquid extraction

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 1899-1903

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.03.030

Keywords

Ionic liquids; Biobutanol; Liquid-liquid extraction; Hydrophobicity; Polarity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korea
  2. Inha University, Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biobutanol has currently attracted considerable attention as an alternative biofuel to the petroleum-derived fuel due to several advantages including high energy content, low water absorption and easy application to the existing gasoline infrastructure. However, its production has still faced many obstacles to overcome including lack of energy-efficient butanol separation process from fermentation broth. To solve this issue, the extraction behavior of butanol from aqueous media into a variety of imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs) was investigated by liquid-liquid extraction. To understand the effect of ILs properties, the solvent characteristics of ILs such as mutual solubility of feed solvent (water) and extraction solvent (IL), distribution coefficient of butanol between water and IL, selectivity, and extraction efficiency were correlated with hydrophobicity and polarity of ILs. The butanol distribution between ILs and water strongly depends on the hydrophobicity of anions of ILs followed by the hydrophobicity of cations of ILs. On the other hand, butanol extraction efficiency and selectivity depend on the polarity of ILs. Considering extraction efficiency and selectivity, [Tf2N]-based ILs among the tested ILs showed to be the best extract solvent for the recovery of butanol from aqueous media. Among the studied ILs, [Omim][Tf2N] showed the highest butanol distribution coefficient (1.939), selectivity (132) and extraction efficiency (74%) at 323.15 K, respectively. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available