4.8 Article

Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108

Keywords

food security; land-use change; biodiversity; climate change; soil fertility

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0620652]
  2. University of Minnesota Institute on the Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global food demand is increasing rapidly, as are the environmental impacts of agricultural expansion. Here, we project global demand for crop production in 2050 and evaluate the environmental impacts of alternative ways that this demand might be met. We find that per capita demand for crops, when measured as caloric or protein content of all crops combined, has been a similarly increasing function of per capita real income since 1960. This relationship forecasts a 100-110% increase in global crop demand from 2005 to 2050. Quantitative assessments show that the environmental impacts of meeting this demand depend on how global agriculture expands. If current trends of greater agricultural intensification in richer nations and greater land clearing (extensification) in poorer nations were to continue, similar to 1 billion ha of land would be cleared globally by 2050, with CO2-C equivalent greenhouse gas emissions reaching similar to 3 Gt y(-1) and N use similar to 250 Mt y(-1) by then. In contrast, if 2050 crop demand was met by moderate intensification focused on existing croplands of underyielding nations, adaptation and transfer of high-yielding technologies to these croplands, and global technological improvements, our analyses forecast land clearing of only similar to 0.2 billion ha, greenhouse gas emissions of similar to 1 Gt y(-1), and global N use of similar to 225 Mt y(-1). Efficient management practices could substantially lower nitrogen use. Attainment of high yields on existing croplands of underyielding nations is of great importance if global crop demand is to be met with minimal environmental impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available