3.9 Article

DESCRIPTION, CIRCUMSCRIPTION AND PHYLOGENETICS OF THE DIGLYPHOSEMATINI BELIZIN 1961, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW GENUS (HYMENOPTERA: FIGITIDAE: EUCOILINAE)

Journal

Publisher

ENTOMOL SOC WASHINGTON
DOI: 10.4289/0013-8797.113.3.239

Keywords

Sinatra; revision; phylogeny

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB9712543]
  2. Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA/ARS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genera comprising the Diglyphosematini Belizin (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Eucoilinae) are redescribed, all of the valid species are cataloged, and a key to all Diglyphosematini genera is provided. To determine the monophyly of each of the included genera, a phylogenetic analysis of 1060 ribosomal characters, 392 mitochondrial characters, and 169 morphological/biological characters was conducted for 18 ingroup taxa in both a parsimony and Bayesian framework. Based on the results presented here and elsewhere, the Diglyphosematini are comprised of the following genera: Banacuniculus Buffington, Diglyphosema Forster, Disorygma Forster, Ealata Quinlan, Ganaspidium Weld, Gronotoma Forster, Microstilba Forster, Nordlanderia Quinlan, Paradiglyphosema Lin, and Tobiasiana Kovalev. Disorygma was not recovered as monophyletic; Sinatra Buffington, new genus, also included in Diglyphosematini, is described to accommodate S. pacifica (Yoshimoto). Nordlanderia, revised status, is removed from synonymy with Tobiasiana. Characters and character states applicable specifically to Diglyphosematini are defined and illustrated. Characters supporting the monophyly of each genus are discussed. All species of Diglyphosematini whose biology has been studied in depth are parasitoids of leaf-mining and stem-mining Agromyzidae (Diptera), or rarely, of fruit infesting Tephritidae (Diptera). New host records for Diglyphosema and Ealata, as well distributions and known type repositories for each species of Diglyphosematini, are reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available