4.7 Article

Cognitive impairment assessed at annual geriatric health examinations predicts mortality among the elderly

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 28-34

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.027

Keywords

Cognitive impairment; Mortality; Elderly; Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Education through its Aim for the Top University Plan
  2. Department of Health of the Taipei City Government [10301-62-001]
  3. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V103C-201]
  4. National Science Council [NSC 98-2314-B-075-029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To determine whether cognitive impairment assessed at annual geriatric health examinations is associated with increased mortality in the elderly. Method. This cohort study was based on data obtained from the government-sponsored Annual Geriatric Health Examination Program for the elderly in Taipei City between 2006 and 2010. The study sample consisted of 77,541 community-dwelling Taipei citizens aged 65 years or older. The Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) was selected to measure cognitive impairment. Mortality was ascertained by matching cohort IDs with national death files. Results. There was a dose-response relationship between cognitive impairment and mortality (increased one score of SPMSQ Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12,95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.14). Relative to no cognitive impairment, the HRs were 1.67 (95% CI: 1.43-1.94), 2.26 (95% CI: 1.90-2.70), and 2.68 (95% CI: 225-3.19) for mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairments, respectively. The causes of death associated with cognitive impairment were circulatory, respiratory, and other causes, but not death from cancer. Conclusion. Cognitive impairment as measured by the SPMSQ is associated with an increased risk for mortality. Even mild cognitive impairment was associated with greater risk of mortality at a relatively short follow-up time. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available