4.7 Article

Overall and central obesity incidence in an urban Portuguese population

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 1-2, Pages 50-55

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.004

Keywords

Incidence; Obesity; Central obesity; Age; Education; Gender effect

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Praxis [POCTI/ESP/42361/2001, POCI/SAU-ESP/61160/2004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To provide overall and central obesity incidence estimates by gender, age and educational level in an urban Portuguese population. Methods. As part of the EPIPorto study, 1,621 Porto, Portugal adult residents were evaluated in 1999-2003 and 2005-2008. Overall obesity was defined by a BMI >= 30.0 kg/m(2) and central obesity by a WC > 88.0 cm in women and > 102.0 cm in men. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed using Poisson regression. Survival analysis was also performed. Results. The age-adjusted incidence rates/100 person-years of overall and central obesity were, respectively, 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34-2.19 and 5.97, 95% CI: 5.09-7.03 in women; 1.08, 95% CI: 0.73-1.64 and 2.38,95% CI: 1.81-3.20 in men. In multivariate analysis, older women presented a higher risk of overall obesity. Moreover, a significant inverse association was found between obesity and education in women (>11 vs. <5 years: RR = 0.43,95% CI: 0.22-0.84, for overall obesity; RR = 0.45 95% Cl: 0.29-0.69, for central obesity). For overall obesity, 10.1% of women and 5.1% of men became obese during the 5-year study period. Higher proportions were observed regarding central obesity, 29.1% and 11.4% for women and men, respectively. Conclusions. Over time, individuals developed central obesity faster than overall obesity. Our results support that increasing levels of education limit this ongoing development of obesity, particularly among women. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available