4.7 Article

Secondhand smoke in hospitals of Catalonia (Spain) before and after a comprehensive ban on smoking at the national level

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 624-628

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.09.003

Keywords

Passive smoking; Tobacco smoke pollution; Environmental tobacco smoke; Airborne nicotine; Hospitals; Smoking ban

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia
  2. Spanish Ministry of Health [RD06/0020/0089, CIBERESP CB06/02/0032]
  3. Ministry of Science and Universities, Government of Catalonia [SGR200500646]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To assess changes in secondhand smoke exposure by means of airborne nicotine concentrations in public hospitals of Catalonia (Spain) before and after a comprehensive national smoking ban. Methods. We monitored vapor-phase nicotine concentrations in 44 public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) before the smoking ban (September-December 2005) and one year after (September-December 2006). We installed 5-7 sampling devices per hospital for 7 days in different places (228 pairs of samples), and 198 pairs of samples were available for the final analysis. Results. The median nicotine concentration declined from 0.23 mu g/m(3) (interquartile range: 0.13-0.63) before the law to 0.10 mu g/m(3) (interquartile range: 0.02-0.19) after the law (% decline=56.5, p<0.01). We observed significant reductions in the median nicotine concentrations in all hospital locations, although secondhand smoke exposure was still present in some places (main hospital entrance, emergency department waiting rooms, fire escapes, and cafeterias). Conclusions. Secondhand smoke in hospitals has decreased after the ban. Assessment of airborne nicotine concentrations appears to be an objective and feasible system to monitor and reinforce the compliance of smoke-free legislations in this setting. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available