4.5 Article

Defining unconformities in Proterozoic sedimentary basins using detrital geochronology and basin analysis - An example from the Mount Isa Inlier, Australia

Journal

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 168, Issue 3-4, Pages 149-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.09.012

Keywords

Mount Isa Inlier; Proterozoic; U-Pb SHRIMP zircon geochronology; Detrital; Basin evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detrital zircons from sedimentary rocks below and above a major regional Palaeoproterozoic unconformity (the similar to 1690-1670 Ma Gun unconformity of the Mount Isa Inlier) were dated using U-Pb SHRIMP techniques to test whether calculated maximum depositional ages could be used to identify this similar to 20 my boundary, and determine which facies provide the best opportunity to identify this surface. We show that samples taken in a landward position directly above the regional unconformity surface from fluvial or incised valley-fill facies contained significant numbers of similar to 1675 Ma ages, suggesting that these settings are the most useful for recording maximum depositional ages close to the actual age of deposition. Likewise, the large numbers of similar to 1680 Ma ages in basinal turbidite deposits indicate that this facies may also be a good target for determining maximum depositional ages close to depositional ages. Integrating this new detrital zircon data with the magmatic record from the similar to 1670 Ma Carters Bore Rhyolite, Sybella Granite and unnamed igneous horizons permits correlation between basin development and magmatism in the Mount Isa Inlier. Magmatic inflation associated with intrusion of the Sybella Granite led to uplift in the Western Succession associated with the Gun unconformity, with erosion and recycling of this hinterland leading to transportation of this material eastward into the deeper water parts of the basin represented by the Soldiers Cap Group. Crown Copyright (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available