4.7 Article

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation

Journal

POULTRY SCIENCE
Volume 92, Issue 9, Pages 2530-2534

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02739

Keywords

single-step genomic relationship matrix; single nucleotide polymorphism; best linear unbiased prediction; genome-wide association study

Funding

  1. Holstein Association
  2. Smithfield Premium Genetics
  3. Pig Improvement Company
  4. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (Washington, DC) from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Animal Genome Program (Washington, DC) [2009-65205-05665, 2010-65205-20366]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genomic selection can be implemented based on the genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP) and can be combined with phenotypes from nongenotyped animals through the use of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). A common method to combine both sources of information involves multiple steps, but is difficult to use with complicated models and is non-optimal. A simpler method, termed single-step GBLUP, or ssGBLUP, integrates the genomically derived relationships (G) with population-based pedigree relationships (A) into a combined relationship matrix (H) and allows for genomic selection in a single step. The ssGBLUP method is easy to implement and uses standard BLUP-based programs. Experiences with field data in chickens, pigs, and dairy indicate that ssGBLUP is more accurate yet much simpler than multi-step methods. The current limits of ssGBLUP are approximately 100,000 genotypes and 18 traits. Models involving 10 million animals have been run successfully. The inverse of H can also be used in existing programs for parameter estimationm, but a properly scaled G is needed for unbiased estimation. Also, as genomic predictions can be converted to SNP effects, ssGBLUP is useful for genomic-wide association studies. The single-step method for genomic selection translates the use of genomic information into standard BLUP, and variance-component estimation programs become a routine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available