4.7 Article

Applicability of aminophthalimide probes for monitoring and acceleration of cationic photopolymerization of epoxides

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 708-715

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.03.009

Keywords

Fluorescent molecular probes; Photopolymerization; Cure monitoring; Photosensitizers

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) [0394/IP3/2011/71]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Applicability of a series of 5-substituted 3-amino-4-cyano-phthalimides as novel fluorescent probes for monitoring and acceleration of cationic photopolymerization of epoxy monomers has been studied. The performance of the following probes/accelerators were evaluated in ring opening photopolymerization of 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl 3,4-epoxycyclohexanecarboxylate (CADE) monomer: 3-amino-4-cyano-5-phenylphthalimide, 3-amino-5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4-cyanophthalimide, 3-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-cyano phthalimide, 3-amino-4-cyano-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)phthalimide, 3-amino-5-([1,1']biphe nyl-4-yl)-4-cyanophthalimide and 3-amino-4-cyano-5-(2-naphthyl)phthalimide. It has been found that these probes are stable under the cationic photopolymerization conditions of CADE and sensitive enough to enable monitoring the entire range of monomer conversions by Fluorescence Probe Technology, while 3-amino-4-cyano-5-(4-methoxyphenyl) phthalimide showed the best performance. At typical probe concentrations, all of the probes studied accelerated the cationic photopolymerization of CADE up to seven times compared to the compositions without any probe. Moreover, these probes shift their fluorescence spectra to longer wavelengths upon polymerization of CADE, that is in the opposite direction to most fluorescent probes. This unusual behavior of the aminophthalimide probes in CADE monomer has been explained on the basis of their solvatochromic data. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available