4.7 Article

Effects of chain microstructures and derived crystallization capability on hydrolytic degradation of poly(L-lactide/ε-caprolactone) copolymers

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 481-489

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.12.014

Keywords

Poly(L-lactide/epsilon-caprolactone); Chain microstructure; Randomness; Crystallization; In vitro degradation

Funding

  1. Basque Government, Department of Education, Universities and Research [GIC10/152-IT-334-10]
  2. Basque Government, Dept. of Industry [IE10/276]
  3. University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrolytic degradation of bioabsorbable (co)polyesters is affected by a great number of factors, such as chemical composition, hydrophilicity, pH of the medium, morphology of the sample, initial distribution of molecular weights, etc. In this study it is demonstrated the importance of the amorphous/crystalline character, controlled by the repeat unit sequence distribution in chain microstructure of crystallizable lactide building block copolymers. Three statistical poly(L-lactide/epsilon-caprolactone) copolymers were degraded in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 37 degrees C for a period up to 14 weeks. PLCL7413 and PLCL74r, presenting similar copolymer composition (similar to 74% of lactide) but a different randomness character (R = 0.46 vs. 0.96) reflected in their lactide sequence length distribution (l(LA)) (8.16 vs. 4.01), displayed a completely dissimilar behavior during the course of degradation. The blocky PLCL74b showed a high crystallization capability, reaching a value of 51.0 Jg(-1) of melting enthalpy (Delta H-m) at the end of the study, whereas random PLCL74r presented a Delta H-m = 33.7 Jg(-1). On the contrary, PLCL62r, having a similar randomness character to PLCL74r, a similar to 62% of lactide content and the lowest l(LA) (2.55), showed a Delta H-m = 10.9 Jg(-1). As a consequence, PLCL74b exhibited the slowest degradation rate (half degradation time (t(1/2)) = 31.5 days), while PLCL62r was the less resistant to hydrolytic degradation with a t(1/2) = 18.2 days. This is due to the larger hindrance the water finds to penetrate the crystalline domains and consequently, to the higher resistance of crystalline domains to hydrolytic degradation. Apart from slowing down the degradation, the development of crystalline domains caused deterioration in the mechanical properties of the studied copolymers, which make them unworkable as the degradation process progressed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available