4.7 Article

Degradation of perfluorinated sulfonic acid films: An in-situ infrared spectro-electrochemical study

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 94, Issue 10, Pages 1707-1713

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.06.015

Keywords

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells; Perfluorinated sulfonic acid; In-situ Fourier transform infrared spectro-electrochemistry; Membrane degradation

Funding

  1. Guangdong Sci. Tech. [2007A010700001, 2007B090400032, 2007Z1-D0051, SKT [2007] 17-11]
  2. Dongguan Sci. Tech. [2005d029]
  3. Ministry of Education of China for Young Teachers [20070558062]
  4. E.U.
  5. Greek Ministry of Development - GSRT [03ED897]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The in-situ Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectro-electrochemical method was used to evaluate the degradation mechanism of perfluorinated sulfonic acid (PFSA) polymer for the first time. The effect of H2O2 concentration in Fenton's reagent on the PFSA film degradation was studied. It was found that the effect of the H2O2 concentration on the chemical degradation of the PFSA film was limited, whereas, the electrochemical degradation was obviously enhanced at higher H2O2 concentrations. The chemical degradation of PFSA film in Fenton's reagent was similar to that in pure H2O2 solution. However, the results indicated that the electrode potential is the dominating factor affecting the degradation of the PFSA film. It is clear that the electrochemical degradation of PFSA film in Fenton's reagent is more serious than that in pure H2O2 solution. Moreover, it is indicated that the main cause of the membrane degradation is the instability of the backbone of the polymer chain under electrochemical conditions and secondarily the loss of sulfuric groups in the side-chains. It is concluded that the in-situ FTIR spectro-electrochemical method could be used to evaluate more objectively the degradation of the polymer film. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available