4.3 Article

Responses of Pygoscelis adeliae and P. papua populations to environmental changes at Isla 25 de Mayo (King George Island)

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1427-1433

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-009-0637-y

Keywords

Pygoscelis penguins; South Shetland Islands; Environmental changes; Population decline; Breeding success

Funding

  1. Direccion Nacional del Antartico
  2. Instituto Antartico Argentino

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As part of a monitoring study of Ad,lie and Gentoo penguin colonies, birds occupying nests with eggs and chicks in crSches were counted annually from the 1995/1996 to the 2006/2007 seasons at Stranger Point, Isla 25 de Mayo (King George Island), Antarctica. During the study period the Ad,lie penguin population showed a decrease of 62%. The number of chicks in crSches followed a similar trend, the smallest number occurring in 2002, when it was 63% lower than in 1995/1996. In contrast, the Gentoo breeding population size increased by 68%, while chicks produced increased by 63%. Despite the opposing trends in population size between species, there was a positive relation in their interannual variation, although the extent, and for some years the direction, of the change observed always favoured Gentoo penguins. Breeding success (chicks in crSches/nests with eggs) fluctuated between 0.65 and 1.26 for Ad,lies and between 0.76 and 1.27 for Gentoo penguins, and did not differ significantly between species. The similar breeding success of these species suggests that the contrasting population trends observed were driven by factors operating over winter. We suggest that current changes in environmental conditions may affect adult birds of both species during the previous winter with different intensity but in a roughly similar way, but that juvenile survival of both species and thus the recruitment of new breeders might be affected differentially, with a much lower survival rate of juvenile Ad,lie penguins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available