Psychometric properties of the German version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in sarcoidosis
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in sarcoidosis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages e0205308
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-10-05
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0205308
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Phenotypes of organ involvement in sarcoidosis
- (2018) Jonas Christian Schupp et al. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
- Screening for depression: Rasch analysis of the structural validity of the PHQ-9 in acutely injured trauma survivors
- (2017) Kaj Sparle Christensen et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
- The Assessment of Cough in a Sarcoidosis Clinic Using a Validated instrument and a Visual Analog Scale
- (2017) Marc A. Judson et al. LUNG
- The Effects of Azithromycin in Treatment-Resistant Cough
- (2016) David Hodgson et al. CHEST
- Predictors of objective cough frequency in pulmonary sarcoidosis
- (2016) Aish Sinha et al. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
- Validation of the Polish Version of the Chronic Cough Quality of Life Questionnaire (Leicester Cough Questionnaire)
- (2016) Marta Dąbrowska et al. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
- Using the Affiliate Stigma Scale with caregivers of people with dementia: psychometric evaluation
- (2016) Chih-Cheng Chang et al. Alzheimers Research & Therapy
- Validation of a Spanish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
- (2016) Gerard Muñoz et al. Chronic Respiratory Disease
- Rasch analysis suggested three unidimensional domains for Affiliate Stigma Scale: additional psychometric evaluation
- (2015) Chih-Cheng Chang et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Impact of Chronic Cough: A Cross-Sectional European Survey
- (2015) Sarah A. F. Chamberlain et al. LUNG
- Reliability and Validity of a Korean Version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire
- (2015) Jae-Woo Kwon et al. Allergy Asthma & Immunology Research
- Validation of the French version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- (2015) Gregory Reychler et al. Chronic Respiratory Disease
- Validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in bronchiectasis
- (2015) Y-H. Gao et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE
- Further Psychometric Evaluation of the Self-Stigma Scale-Short: Measurement Invariance across Mental Illness and Gender
- (2015) Tsung-Hsien Wu et al. PLoS One
- Leicester Cough Questionnaire: translation to Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil
- (2014) Manuela Brisot Felisbino et al. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
- Reliability and validity of Leicester Cough Questionnaire Korean version
- (2014) Jong-Min Han et al. Chronic Respiratory Disease
- Participation and social functioning in patients with fibromyalgia: development and testing of a new questionnaire
- (2013) Erik Farin et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Sarcoidosis
- (2013) Dominique Valeyre et al. LANCET
- The validity and precision of the leicester cough questionnaire in COPD patients with chronic cough
- (2012) Farida F Berkhof et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Validation of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
- (2009) M. P. Murray et al. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
- Thai SF-36 health survey: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in healthy men and women
- (2008) Lynette Lim et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Literature Review of Methods to Translate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires for Use in Multinational Clinical Trials
- (2008) Catherine Acquadro et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started