4.6 Article

Modeling of xenobiotic transport and metabolism in virtual hepatic lobule models

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM111243, GM076692]
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [R835001]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF 1720625]
  4. Falk Medical Research Trust Catalyst Program [Falk 44-38-12]
  5. National Institutes of Health O'Brien Center for Advanced Renal Microscopic Analysis [NIH-NIDDK P30DK079312]
  6. EPA [R835001, 150263] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational models of normal liver function and xenobiotic induced liver damage are increasingly being used to interpret in vitro and in vivo data and as an approach to the de novo prediction of the liver's response to xenobiotics. The microdosimetry (dose at the level of individual cells) of xenobiotics vary spatially within the liver because of both compound-independent and compound-dependent factors. In this paper, we build model liver lobules to investigate the interplay between vascular structure, blood flow and cellular transport that lead to regional variations in microdosimetry. We then compared simulation results obtained using this complex spatial model with a simpler linear pipe model of a sinusoid and a very simple single box model. We found that variations in diffusive transport, transporter-mediated transport and metabolism, coupled with complex liver sinusoid architecture and blood flow distribution, led to three essential patterns of xenobiotic exposure within the virtual liver lobule: (1) lobular-wise uniform, (2) radially varying and (3) both radially and azimuthally varying. We propose to use these essential patterns of exposure as a reference for selection of model representations when a computational study involves modeling detailed hepatic responses to xenobiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available