How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?

US law could increase postdoc pay — and shake up research system

(2016) Heidi Ledford   NATURE

Characteristics, Satisfaction, and Engagement of Part-Time Faculty at U.S. Medical Schools

(2015) Susan M. Pollart et al.   ACADEMIC MEDICINE

Healing the NIH-Funded Biomedical Research Enterprise

(2015) Ronald N. Germain   CELL

The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers

(2014) Danielle L Herbert et al.   BMJ Open

The Transformative Nature of Transparency in Research Funding

(2014) Daniel Mietchen   PLOS BIOLOGY

Australia's grant system wastes time

(2013) Danielle L. Herbert et al.   NATURE

Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding

(2013) Jean-Michel Fortin et al.   PLoS One

Fund people not projects

(2011) John P. A. Ioannidis   NATURE

Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant

(2009) Richard Gordon et al.   Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications

(2009) Lutz Bornmann et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system

(2008) V. E. Johnson   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA