Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review
Authors
Keywords
Peer review, Research grants, Database searching, Health services research, Libraries, Sexual and gender issues, Workshops, Citation analysis
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages e0169718
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2017-01-10
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0169718
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Programmatic Efforts at the National Institutes of Health to Promote and Support the Careers of Women in Biomedical Science
- (2016) Jennifer L. Plank-Bazinet et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores
- (2016) Anna Kaatz et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
- (2016) Andrea C. Tricco et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Gender equity programmes in academic medicine: a realist evaluation approach to Athena SWAN processes
- (2016) Louise Caffrey et al. BMJ Open
- A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution
- (2015) Anna Kaatz et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution
- (2015) Molly Carnes et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- A scoping review of rapid review methods
- (2015) Andrea C. Tricco et al. BMC Medicine
- Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands
- (2015) Romy van der Lee et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Gender Differences in Successful National Institutes of Health Funding in Ophthalmology
- (2014) Peter F. Svider et al. Journal of Surgical Education
- Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender
- (2014) Anna Kaatz et al. TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Differences in research funding for women scientists: a systematic comparison of UK investments in global infectious disease research during 1997–2010
- (2013) Michael G Head et al. BMJ Open
- Gender inequality in awarded research grants
- (2012) Gillinder Bedi et al. LANCET
- Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs
- (2011) Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research
- (2010) Annaliese K. Beery et al. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
- Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review
- (2009) Carol Isaac et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty
- (2008) Susan E. Waisbren et al. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
- SOCIOLOGY: The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications
- (2008) T. J. Ley et al. SCIENCE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation