4.6 Article

Bicarbonate Increases Ischemia-Reperfusion Damage by Inhibiting Mitophagy

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167678

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [10/51906-1]
  2. Centro de Pesquisa, Inovacao e Difusao de Processos Redox em Biomedicina [13/07937-8]
  3. Nucleo de Pesquisa em Processos Redox em Biomedicina (NAP-Rexodoma)
  4. Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Processos Redox em Biomedicina (INCT Redoxoma)
  5. NIH [P01 HL112730]
  6. FAPESP [2009/50168-0, 2013/07292-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During an ischemic event, bicarbonate and CO2 concentration increase as a consequence of O-2 consumption and lack of blood flow. This event is important as bicarbonate/CO2 is determinant for several redox and enzymatic reactions, in addition to pH regulation. Until now, most work done on the role of bicarbonate in ischemia-reperfusion injury focused on pH changes; although reperfusion solutions have a fixed pH, cardiac resuscitation protocols commonly employ bicarbonate to correct the profound acidosis associated with respiratory arrest. However, we previously showed that bicarbonate can increase tissue damage and protein oxidative damage independent of pH. Here we show the molecular basis of bicarbonate- induced reperfusion damage: the presence of bicarbonate selectively impairs mitophagy, with no detectable effect on autophagy, proteasome activity, reactive oxygen species production or protein oxidation. We also show that inhibition of autophagy reproduces the effects of bicarbonate in reperfusion injury, providing additional evidence in support of this mechanism. This phenomenon is especially important because bicarbonate is widely used in resuscitation protocols after cardiac arrest, and while effective as a buffer, may also contribute to myocardial injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available