4.6 Article

Remote Liver Ischemic Preconditioning Protects against Sudden Cardiac Death via an ERK/GSK-3β-Dependent Mechanism

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165123

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670300, 81271342]
  2. US National Institutes of Health [HL079275]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Preconditioning stimuli conducted in remote organs can protect the heart against subsequent ischemic injury, but effects on arrhythmogenesis and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are unclear. Here, we investigated the effect of remote liver ischemia preconditioning (RLIPC) on ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in vivo, and determined the potential role of ERK/GSK-3 beta signaling. Methods/Results Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomized to sham-operated, control, or RLIPC groups. RLIPC was induced by alternating four 5-minute cycles of liver ischemia with 5-minute intermittent reperfusions. To investigate I/R-induced arrhythmogenesis, hearts in each group were subsequently subjected to 5-minute left main coronary artery ligation followed by 20-minute reperfusion. RLIPC reduced post-I/R ventricular arrhythmias, and decreased the incidence of SCD >threefold. RLIPC increased phosphorylation of cardiac ERK1/2, and GSK-3 beta Ser9 but not Tyr216 post-I/R injury. Inhibition of either GSK-3 beta (with SB216763) or ERK1/2 (with U0126) abolished RLIPC-induced antiarrhythmic activity and GSK-3 beta Ser9 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, leaving GSK-3 beta Tyr216 phosphorylation unchanged. Conclusions RLIPC exerts a powerful antiarrhythmic effect and reduces predisposition to post-IR SCD. The underlying mechanism of RLIPC cardioprotection against I/R-induced early arrhythmogenesis may involve ERK1/2/GSK-3 beta Ser9-dependent pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available